Borrowing from the blog’s about description,
the SA Incubator is, “a place where we explore and highlight the work of new
and young science writers and journalists, especially those who are current or
recent students in specialized science, health, and environmental reporting
programs in schools of journalism.”
USAGOV-USDA-ARS via Wikimedia Commons |
On the SA Incubator you can find profiles of
new and young science writers, links to interesting work from these science
writers (and others) chosen by the blog’s editors, profiles of student run
science publications, and other assorted posts on topics of interest to writers
who are just getting started.
I think you would be hard pressed to find a
science writer who doesn’t aspire to see their name in Scientific American.
Speaking from personal experience, having a profile dedicated to you and your
work on a Scientific American blog is a thrill. It was an experience
that I enjoyed so much that I wanted to learn more about why a publication like
Scientific American would set aside such a great space on their network
for someone like me. What is in it for them?
To answer that question, I turned to the Blogfather
himself, Bora Zivkovic. The SA Incubator is written by Zivkovic, who is the Blogs
Editor at Scientific American, and Khalil Cassimally, community manager
of Nature Education’s Scitable blog network.
How Big Can It Be?
According to Zivkovic, there are a lot of
reasons why the Scientific American network includes a blog about new
and young science writers. One reason is the network’s size. When it launched
in the summer of 2011, I remember being struck by the sheer volume of awesome
that is included in Scientific American’s blog network. While it is a
large network, there are still limits on how many blogs can be included. The
cost, time and effort it takes to manage the network are obvious reasons why
there would be a limit, but Zivkovic also pointed out that some of the value of
having a network in the first place comes from it being of a limited size.
One of the coolest things about the Scientific
American network is the diversity of writers and topics. If the network got
any bigger, it would be difficult for the average person to read all of the
posts. If the number of posts becomes daunting, the reader’s habits will change
from browsing to more targeted reading. “Instead of at least occasionally checking
out all of the bloggers they only focus on their favorites (some readers always
will, but at least some don't) - thus the 'network effect' for bloggers is
diminished,” said Zivkovic.
What does that mean for the SA Incubator? There simply isn’t space for
everyone to have their own blog on the network. Therefore, creating a blog that
includes a lot of work by a lot of people is a way to increase the number of
voices in the network without it becoming completely overwhelming. It also
gives Scientific American a chance to
bring new members into the family of bloggers without diluting the existing community
too much. According to Zivkovic, this helps maintain a balance between keeping
the network fresh and diverse while still keeping it coherent and friendly. For
the new and young science writers it is difficult to compete with more seasoned
bloggers for a space in the regular network. The SA Incubator gives new and
young writers a space where they can participate and be seen and heard without
taxing the network.
For new and young science writers, the SA Incubator is also a way to
have a presence in the network without having to take on the full
responsibility of having your own blog. Zivkovic explained the juggling act new
and young writers perform: “Many of the youngest writers are still in school,
too busy with class assignments, or are in internships, or are too busy
breaking into freelancing to be able to blog with regular frequency.” The SA
Incubator gives these writers the opportunity to get noticed without adding to
the stress and demands of finding your way as a journalist.
Getting Over The
Wall, and Getting A Job
Another reason to include a blog for new and young science writers is
because the job we do is so important, but so competitive and difficult to
break into. There is a big difference between a general reporter and a science
writer; the more skilled science writers we have out there, the better. When I
think of science writers I admire and the good work that they do; good to me
meaning factual, nuanced, interesting and true; I’m inspired and intimidated.
Inspired because I really believe science writers can make a huge difference in
helping people understand and appreciate science, and intimidated because the
bar has been set very high. The more people we have out there combating the bad
science coverage by debunking, clarifying, and explaining, the better.
When journalists talk about this we tend to refer to it as the Push vs. Pull strategy. Essentially, it is the idea that if the general public isn't drawn to science stories on their own (pull) perhaps we can bring the science stories to them wherever they are (push). To be able to be able to pull people into places where they can access science content and also push out science content everywhere we can, we need a large well trained work force. Increasing the profile of new and young science writers and helping them get
the opportunity to do this job is the value of the SA Incubator.
According to Zivkovic, helping get new and young science writers hired
is part of the joy of running a blog like the SA Incubator. If you are looking
to hire a science writer, you can find them at Scientific American on the blogs homepage, in the weekly linkfests, in the
ScienceOnline interviews, on the Guest Blog and on the Incubator. As Zivkovic said, “Hire
away! Let the good young writers infiltrate the media giants and transform them
from within.”
For Zivkovic, giving new and young science writers a hand really is
about community. To understand why, he recommended reading and watching Robert
Krulwich’s commencement speech to the Berkeley Journalism School’s Class of
2011, which I too recommend. Krulwich talks about how to get over the wall that
new writers face. The wall is what separates you from the journalists who
actually get to do what you want to do.
Zivkovic isn’t a trained writer, but he started blogging about science
back in 2004 anyway. He was invited to a blogging network in 2006. His job as
Blogs Editor at Scientific American?
Yeah, safe to say his blogging had something to do with that. This success
story is something he attributes to the science blogging community. Blogging is
what got Zivkovic over the wall, and now he is running the SA Incubator to help
people like me figure out a way to pull themselves up over that same wall.
“These people became my community, my second family. It is that
community that helped me every step of the way. They cheered me on. They hit my
PayPal button when I was jobless. They pushed for me to get hired. They keep
coming to ScienceOnline, they hug me at tweetups, they submit posts to Open
Laboratory, they say Yes when I invite them to join the SciAm blog network,
they were there for me all along and helped me climb over the wall. It's
payback time. It is now my turn to help others climb that wall, too.”
That is why he gets to be the Blogfather.
We’re In This
Together
As if that isn’t enough, Zivkovic mentioned one other reason why he
thinks the SA Incubator has value for the Scientific
American blogs network, the concept of horizontal loyalty. Horizontal
loyalty is a phrase borrowed from the Krulwich talk I mentioned earlier
(seriously, go read it…after you finish this.) It is making something of
yourself alongside people who are also trying to make something of themselves.
Do it together. Make something. Be something. For Zivkovic, this is very much a
part of why the SA Incubator exists.
“It is not so much about helping new writers get jobs in old media
companies (though that helps pay bills for a little while). It is about helping
them find each other, build relationships, build friendships, build start-ups,
build a whole new science writing ecosystem that will automatically do both 'push' and 'pull' and reach everyone and displace bad
science reporting from the most visible areas of the media, while providing
them with a living,” says Zivkovic. “This requires a lot of them, but they need
to know each other and work together toward that goal.”
So there you have it. The SA Incubator: Helping Hatch Science Writers Since July 2011. Creating a community for
those of us who so badly want to be out there working alongside the more
established writers to tell what I think are some of the most important stories there are. I was truly humbled to be counted among so many great science
writers and be given a space on the SA Incubator. I wrote this post because I’m
grateful for the chance to be included, but also because I really believe
having a space for new and young science writers to connect and promote
themselves is important. Baby chickens (and baby science writers too) all have
to start somewhere.
Now, if you are a fellow fledgling science
writer I know what you are thinking. You are thinking how can I get in on this?
You can start by following, subscribing, etc. on Twitter, Facebook, or Google+.
You can start commenting on the blogs in the Scientific American network
(Zivkovic reads all the comments.) You can also go the direct route and just
introduce yourself. Send an email, pitch to the Guest Blog, or send Zivkovic a
link to some of your work. A direct message on Twitter would work too; you can
find him @BoraZ.
What a inspiring post I've ever read! I'm now just a baby chicken researcher and not currently a science writer, but someday I really like to join your group. Maybe starting from writing a short article or at least a comment about several science news helps me. Hope to see you on my post.
ReplyDeleteThanks so much for your comment, we can use all the good science writers we can get!
DeleteNice post Erin. I quite liked your interview on SA Incubator and look forward to reading more of your work.
ReplyDeleteThanks so much Khalil!
DeleteLoved the post! As someone who is about 2 weeks into science (psychology) blogging, Bora's a already been a tremendous help and inspiration. Thanks for writing this!
ReplyDeleteThanks Dave, glad you enjoyed it!
Deleteugg boots, true religion jeans, michael kors, vanessa bruno, true religion jeans, coach outlet, nike air max, nike air max, michael kors, mulberry, abercrombie and fitch, north face, hollister, hogan, burberry outlet online, michael kors outlet, timberland, coach outlet, michael kors outlet, nike air max, sac guess, oakley pas cher, air force, nike roshe, nike free run uk, michael kors, hermes, michael kors outlet, lacoste pas cher, coach purses, ray ban pas cher, michael kors, michael kors outlet, burberry, vans pas cher, converse pas cher, tn pas cher, kate spade handbags, new balance pas cher, true religion jeans, nike blazer, north face, lululemon, true religion outlet, ugg boots, michael kors outlet, hollister pas cher, replica handbags, ray ban uk, ralph lauren uk
ReplyDelete