In summary, the article is about a massive die-off of freshwater peal mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera) which are a type of mollusk. The BBC reported that 80,000 of the mussels were lost in a single event out of a total estimated population of 12 million in England and Scotland. It was speculated that the event was caused by a loss of outflow from a lake that caused water temperature to go up and oxygen levels to go down. According to the BBC's article the loss is significant because it happened in an individual incident and because the freshwater pearl mussel is listed by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as one what the BBC called the most endangered species.
I was struck by the term "most endangered" because endangered is in itself a classification. I've written about IUCN red list classifications before, but I went back to their website to check how they define the status of a species. The IUCN has nine classifications for a species, they are:
![]() |
via Wikimedia Commons |
- Extinct
- Extinct in the Wild
- Critically Endangered
- Endangered
- Vulnerable
- Near Threatened
- Least Concern
- Data Deficient
- Not Evaluated
I can't help but wonder, how much nuance is too much nuance? I think it is very important to provide context and evidence when doing something like evaluating the state of a species. As science writers, we need to be specific because it helps avoid confusion or misrepresentation. I think the classifications are good because they help people determine how a species is doing and what should be of most concern. However, is it possible that by covering the shift of a species from level to level, or a mostly-bad-but-there-are-still-some-that-are-doing-okay-so-all-is-not-lost-event we are causing the public to care less? How many people read the BBC's article and thought, "oh no, not the freshwater pearl mussel!"
But is lack of love for the freshwater pearl mussel really a reflection of uninteresting media coverage or just the lack of sexiness of the mollusk? Would the giant panda cause a bigger stir, just because it is a giant panda? Probably. Though theoretically all species are important, and seeing one in peril is always worrisome. While you can definitely argue that species like this and the problems they face don't get nearly enough media attention and thus the coverage that it does get is a solid positive, I can't help but wonder if people start to get jaded when they see stories like this. Personally, I thought the article in the BBC was interesting. I learned about a species that I wasn't familiar with and problems that it and other species face. I think it was worth the time and worth the coverage, I just don't think that opinion is going to land me in the majority.
So then is this a damned if you do and damned if you don't situation? Perhaps it is. I think the argument could be made on both sides. Covering an event that is important to a specific species, even when it does not cause it to become endangered or extinct can muddy the waters so to speak and make readers exasperated with stories that don't seem pertinent in the grand scheme of things. Covering an event that is important to a specific species can also provide the public with information that is necessary to helping that species survive and can help them learn something interesting in the process. I think any story about species conservation walks a fine line between being appealing and entertaining while still being relevant and interesting.
What do you think, is the freshwater pearl mollusk worth covering? Would you cover it in print or only online? Does having an online platform make you more likely to cover it because it costs you less to do so? Do you think you can make the public jaded with stories that are interesting to science lovers but perhaps not to the general non-science minded public? Would that affect your choice to cover the species? Lots of questions and things to think about. If you've got some thoughts on the matter I'd love to hear them so leave them in the comments!
Of course it's worth covering. I write about endangered species all over the world (1,300 articles and counting) and you can't always cover the charismatic megafauna like the giant panda. I might not expect a story about a mollusk to get as many readers as a story about Lonesome George (one of my most-read stories in recent months), but it's important to balance out all species when covering environmental topics. The issues that cause the freshwater pearl mollusk to be endangered affect other species as well, including our own.
ReplyDeleteYes, there's certainly a risk of numbing the public (I know many of my friends say they often don't read my articles because they just can't bear to hear about another species at risk), but the stories still need to be told.
Check out my endangered species coverage here: http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/extinction-countdown/
Thanks for the comment John, I'll be sure to check out your endangered species coverage. I've covered other endangered species news here as well, and also think how and why we cover endangered species news is worth talking about. You raise a good point that issues that effect a less charismatic species can and do affect other species.
DeleteI am so thankful for your contribution; it is a nice writing piece. Simply have in mind that every particular order is being prepared by the assigned paper writer. Good luck!
ReplyDeletelongchamp, louboutin shoes, christian louboutin outlet, louis vuitton outlet, louis vuitton, prada handbags, oakley sunglasses, kate spade outlet, air jordan pas cher, oakley sunglasses, polo ralph lauren outlet, louis vuitton, louis vuitton outlet, oakley sunglasses, uggs on sale, nike free, nike free, replica watches, tiffany and co, polo ralph lauren outlet, sac longchamp, ray ban sunglasses, longchamp outlet, oakley sunglasses, ugg boots, louboutin outlet, prada outlet, ray ban sunglasses, ray ban sunglasses, ugg boots, gucci outlet, jordan shoes, nike outlet, air max, longchamp outlet, louis vuitton, longchamp pas cher, louboutin pas cher, tiffany jewelry, replica watches, michael kors, tory burch outlet, louboutin, nike air max, nike air max, ralph lauren pas cher, cheap oakley sunglasses, nike roshe run, chanel handbags, burberry
ReplyDeleteugg boots, true religion jeans, michael kors, vanessa bruno, true religion jeans, coach outlet, nike air max, nike air max, michael kors, mulberry, abercrombie and fitch, north face, hollister, hogan, burberry outlet online, michael kors outlet, timberland, coach outlet, michael kors outlet, nike air max, sac guess, oakley pas cher, air force, nike roshe, nike free run uk, michael kors, hermes, michael kors outlet, lacoste pas cher, coach purses, ray ban pas cher, michael kors, michael kors outlet, burberry, vans pas cher, converse pas cher, tn pas cher, kate spade handbags, new balance pas cher, true religion jeans, nike blazer, north face, lululemon, true religion outlet, ugg boots, michael kors outlet, hollister pas cher, replica handbags, ray ban uk, ralph lauren uk
ReplyDeletebaseball bats, hollister, celine handbags, north face outlet, soccer jerseys, wedding dresses, ghd, birkin bag, lululemon, nike air max, louboutin, insanity workout, giuseppe zanotti, oakley, mac cosmetics, north face outlet, valentino shoes, ferragamo shoes, nike air max, vans, ralph lauren, chi flat iron, nike trainers, asics running shoes, converse, soccer shoes, vans shoes, herve leger, nfl jerseys, longchamp, abercrombie and fitch, converse outlet, mcm handbags, mont blanc, instyler, gucci, p90x workout, bottega veneta, nike huarache, jimmy choo shoes, hollister, babyliss, ray ban, hollister, new balance, reebok shoes, timberland boots, nike roshe, iphone cases, beats by dre
ReplyDeleteswarovski crystal, ugg boots uk, canada goose, louis vuitton, montre pas cher, pandora charms, moncler, pandora charms, karen millen, canada goose outlet, ugg,uggs,uggs canada, ugg,ugg australia,ugg italia, moncler, moncler, moncler, ugg pas cher, moncler, bottes ugg, barbour jackets, thomas sabo, supra shoes, louis vuitton, louis vuitton, canada goose, moncler, sac louis vuitton pas cher, juicy couture outlet, canada goose uk, moncler, coach outlet, juicy couture outlet, louis vuitton, moncler outlet, lancel, canada goose outlet, hollister, wedding dresses, links of london, barbour, swarovski, doudoune canada goose, toms shoes, canada goose, canada goose, pandora jewelry, replica watches, marc jacobs, pandora jewelry
ReplyDeletelouis vuitton handbags
ReplyDeletechristian louboutin outlet
rolex submariner
coach outlet online
nike air max
kate spade
cheap jordan shoes
coach factory outlet
michael kors handbags
cheap oakleys
polo ralph lauren
cheap ray ban sunglasses
oakley sunglasses
vans shoes outlet
kobe bryant shoes
toms outlet
adidas originals
tiffany outlet
ray ban
true religion outlet
polo ralph lauren
celine handbags
adidas stan smith
lebron james shoes
coach outlet
michael kors outlet
ray ban sunglasses
cheap jordans
jordans
ray ban sunglasses outlet
mont blanc pens
nike air force
louis vuitton handbags
nike basketball shoes
nike free run 2
rolex watches outlet
cheap jordans
ray ban sunglasses
kevin durant shoes 8
louis vuitton outlet
20167.5wengdongdong